Jó 4
John Chrysostom · Comentário Patrístico (catena)
Jó 4:1-2
What does Eliphaz say? "Have you often spoken in your suffering?" By "suffering" the Scripture may signify "sin," as it states, "Under his tongue is mischief." Eliphaz did not say, Have you committed any evil action? Eliphaz asks, "Have you spoken?" Indeed the fame of Job's life shone everywhere, and many still testified to Job's virtue. It is useless, Eliphaz says to Job, to say that your deeds are just and good, for the very reason that the fault is sometimes found in the words we speak. "And who can tolerate the violence of your words?" Consider now the expression "Have you often spoken?" The hesitation and uncertainty do not come from his moderation but from the fact that Eliphaz cannot convince Job about an evident fault on his part, "the violence of your words." What did Job say? He wished to die and to be delivered from his present life. Did Job actually say, "Is it in spite of my justice and virtues that I suffer such misfortunes"? No. He said, "I wanted to disappear with the impious, with my servants, with the stillborn. I wanted to have the same fate as the impious." He did not say, "I, who have such qualities and such importance." — COMMENTARY ON JOB 4:2
Jó 4:6
"Is not your fear based on folly, as is your hope, and your mischievous ways?" That is to say, was there not a foolish intention behind your actions? Eliphaz means, "Either you have not done these things, or your life is full of evil. Or you do not fear God with a righteous intention and all that you say is mere words. Your hope is based on folly." Eliphaz states that Job's hope was filled with foolishness. Why? Is it necessary to say that? Is it not possible that after often helping his neighbor, he has now fallen into misfortune? "No," says Eliphaz. — COMMENTARY ON JOB 4:6
Jó 4:10-11
The writer mentions natural things, that is, nothing that is new or unusual. Certain laws regulate everything, and nothing has changed. Indeed, if what concerns wild beasts remains the same, even more so what concerns us remains unchanged. If it is not possible to restrain "the strength of the lion," then the righteous also cannot be prevented from talking frankly. In fact, as the wild beast naturally possesses strength, so also the righteous person possesses a natural power and force. Actually it is more likely for a lion to become weak than for a righteous person to allow others to manipulate him. — COMMENTARY ON JOB 4:10
Jó 4:12
In the present case Eliphaz wants to suggest, in my opinion, that Job has often spoken such words either, perhaps, to drive others to jealousy or with a different intention. You that ask such questions, see whom you resemble. Indeed, if Eliphaz has spoken so in these circumstances without obtaining forgiveness, it will be the same for us. Our situation will be even worse, because we have views similar to those of Eliphaz. And we have the advantage of the proofs the facts provide. We have been allowed to see the real reasons for the misfortunes that happened to Job. Yet we are just like those who believe they found a reason to blame him and to attack him without waiting for the evidence of the facts. — COMMENTARY ON JOB 4:12